Recovery & strength
Peptides for the immune system and inflammation
Three entries, and the distance between them is the point.
The evidence mix
The 3 peptides on this page, by how well they have been tested.
- Approved medicine1 peptide
- Still being tested in peoplenone on this page
- Tested in people, but barely1 peptide
- Only tested on animals1 peptide
- No real evidence at allnone on this page
One is a real prescription medicine, approved in Italy since the 1990s for one narrow use — as a helper for the flu jab in people whose immune system is weak — while what it is actually famous for has been tested and mostly failed: in 1,106 adults with sepsis, deaths within 28 days were 23.4 per cent on the drug against 24.1 per cent on dummy injections, and the immune marker it is supposed to raise did not move. The second is a copy of a peptide the body itself makes, with one properly controlled trial behind it and a published harm signal sitting alongside the benefit one. The third has never been given to a person in a published study at all. An immune system is not a dial that reads high or low, and nothing on this page has shown it can be turned in a chosen direction and left there.
All 3 peptides on this page
Strongest evidence first.
Approved medicine
Approved by the European or US medicines regulator for a named condition, after large randomised trials, with a public product information sheet anyone can read.
1 peptide
Tested in people, but barely
Human studies exist, but they are small, short, uncontrolled, paid for by the seller, or they measure something easy to measure instead of something that matters.
1 peptide
Only tested on animals
The evidence is animal experiments, cells in a dish, or computer models. No meaningful controlled trial in humans has been published.
1 peptide